MikeB Posted December 14, 2013 Posted December 14, 2013 The issue is the degree of criminality. The prosecution chose to charge all 4 equally with murder, a nonbailable offense, because of the mitigating factor of “use of superior force”. The judge said he doesn’t buy it because of the victim’s size and combat training so he granted bail. The PNP medical officer who did the autopsy testified that a single knife wound to the neck severed the carotid artery causing massive loss of blood killing Major Anikow. He further stated that death from such an injury should occur within 5 or 10 minutes. Yet he was apparently still alive at the hospital some 3 hours later. Then there was at least a 45 min wait for an ambulance at 4am in Makati while he was bleeding to death. Why? The accused are from wealthy families, they have the best lawyers money can buy. One of their fathers, a doctor, told reporters he would personally speak to President Aquino about the way his son was being treated. There is a single prosecutor handling this case; she was quoted as saying, in part, that she didn’t know how to proceed after the defendants were granted bail because what they had presented was the strongest part of their case.http://www.rappler.com/nation/20369-fatal-stab-killed-american-in-makati-medical-officer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Peterson Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 The issue is the degree of criminality. Guilt by association and being at the scene at the time. The whole thing stinks of the "Old pals Act" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve & Myrlita Posted December 15, 2013 Posted December 15, 2013 Sounds like the "Good Ol Boys" Club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Methersgate Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 There will be no convictions. There were two witnesses, a taxi driver and the security guard. The taxi driver is nowhere to be found and you can bet the defence have found the guard and, more important, his family.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 There will be no convictions I agree - for murder. Curious decision by the sole prosecutor to charge all 4 with murder, perhaps the EYES of the embassy played a part in that. you can bet the defence have found the guard and, more important, his family. To threaten or pay off? His story didn't change from the 1st time he was questioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Methersgate Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 Under English law, which is only faintly relevant, all four could be charged with murder under the doctrine of joint enterprise. Let us see what the guard says on the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 Under Philippine law all 4 were charged with murder qualified by the abuse of "superior strength" and conspiracy. The judge didn't buy the prosecutor's theory and granted bail. The guard has already testified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve & Myrlita Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 They will all eventually walk. Over the last 7 years here it has become quite obvious that murdering a foreigner is only illegal on paper. In reality, no one ever pays. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 They will all eventually walk. Over the last 7 years here it has become quite obvious that murdering a foreigner is only illegal on paper. In reality, no one ever pays. Based on the evidence presented at the bail hearing, the judge felt the state did not meet the burden of establishing a charge of murder w/qualifying factors. From the prosecution's perspective there are big problems proving murder against all four in this case, especially since the defendants seem to have the superior council. This is a very tragic case but sometimes they get it right in spite of the fact that we disagree or think we know better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeB Posted August 23, 2014 Posted August 23, 2014 I changed the topic title, Mr Anikow was originally identified in the press as a US diplomat but he was not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now