Jollygoodfellow Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Catch me if you can, well they have idiot :) Singaporean defrauds PH hotel, gets 4-yr jail term A Singaporean national who once dared authorities “to catch him if they can” has been convicted by a regional trial court in Dumaguete City for estafa after he was found guilty of non-payment of fees at a local hotel in 2013. In a 15-page decision released by the Department of Justice, Judge Rosendo Bandal Jr. of Dumaguete City RTC-Branch 34, found Jonathan Lee Seng Tan guilty beyond reasonable doubt of violating Article 315 of the Revised Penal Code. The judge meted Tan with a prison term ranging from four years and two months to eight years. The court also ordered Tan to pay Bethel Guest House, a hotel in the city, the amount of P19,506.52 representing the accommodation, food and other services he availed of during his stay from August 19 to September 1, but did not pay, plus legal interest of 12 percent per annum until fully paid. Currently detained at the Dumaguete city jail, Tan was ordered transferred to the New Bilibid Prison in Muntinlupa City. “The willful and deliberate act of the accused in defrauding the hotel on the payment of his hotel bill is very manifest and evident,” the decision stated. “It appears obvious that the allegation of the accused that the bag containing his money and personal belongings were stolen while sitting in the park is a mere concoction and fabrication on his part,” the court said. Court records showed that Tan checked into the hotel after claiming he was robbed of his belongings at Quezon Park. He was assisted by hotel staff to contact his relatives in Singapore and the Singaporean Embassy so he could replace his stolen passport and settle his obligations with the hotel. A hotel staff communicated with Tan’s brother via e-mail, but still no money was sent to pay for his bill. The accused left the hotel on Sept.1, 2013 without paying his bill. During trial, Assistant City Prosecutor Alvin Aseniero presented as evidence Tan’s Facebook post where he even boasted his alleged other criminal activities in La Trinidad and Iloilo City and challenged authorities to “catch me if you can.” Justice Secretary Leila de Lima hailed Prosecutor Aseniero for successfully prosecuting the case and securing a conviction of the foreigner. “Let this be a warning to everyone. Our laws are enforced against anyone who is under our country’s jurisdiction, and foreigners are definitely not exempted,” De Lima said in a statement. http://manilastandardtoday.com/2015/07/07/s-porean-defrauds-ph-hotel-gets-4-yr-jail-term/ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call me bubba Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 this is amazing... A conviction under 5 years.... :1 (103): 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon1 Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Wow! for a $500 bill he gets 4+ years in prison and goads on the judicial system.. Like someone's signature line here "You can't fix stupid" or as Jeff Foxworthy would say "Here's your sign".... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Peterson Posted July 8, 2015 Posted July 8, 2015 this is amazing... A conviction under 5 years.... If course we have to Remember the Hotel Owner is a very Big name in Dumaguete who just happens to have a Daughter and Niece at Halls of justice. JP :tiphat: 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hounddriver Posted July 8, 2015 Posted July 8, 2015 If course we have to Remember the Hotel Owner is a very Big name in Dumaguete who just happens to have a Daughter and Niece at Halls of justice. We should also remember that the hotel prides itself on its Christian principles and realize that this is an example of how they 'Do Unto Others' 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i am bob Posted July 8, 2015 Posted July 8, 2015 I thought the hotel owner wanted the thief sent to prison - so the thief could learn how to turn the other cheek! ;D 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gratefuled Posted July 8, 2015 Posted July 8, 2015 5 years is a lot of time for what he did but nevertheless, he deserved to be jailed. He may not have to do the entire 5 years and might get out sooner. At least he will be taught a lesson. I guess it also serves as a notice to anyone who is tempted to commit a crime in the Philippines. I've heard some stories that they serve dog meat. Dogs that have been picked up by Animal Control. Maybe even styrofoam rice now that they found some. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted July 9, 2015 Posted July 9, 2015 5 years is a lot of time for what he did but nevertheless, he deserved to be jailed. He may not have to do the entire 5 years and might get out sooner. At least he will be taught a lesson. I guess it also serves as a notice to anyone who is tempted to commit a crime in the Philippines. I've heard some stories that they serve dog meat. Dogs that have been picked up by Animal Control. Maybe even styrofoam rice now that they found some. Maybe even styrofoam rice now that they found some. Hey Gratefuled, you have a morbid sense of humor and I like that! Where's my triple LIKE button? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Call me bubba Posted July 18, 2015 Posted July 18, 2015 legal note of the accused Right to Presumption of Innocence (Sec. 14 (2), Art. III) No person shall be convicted of a crime except upon his confession, or unless his guilt is established by proof beyond reasonable doubt which is more than just a preponderance of evidence sufficient to win in a civil case. The burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is upon the prosecution. Its evidence must be strong enough to overturn the presumption of innocence of the accused. In case, there is a reasonable doubt of his guilt, the accused is entitled to an acquittal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Posted July 18, 2015 Posted July 18, 2015 legal note of the accused Right to Presumption of Innocence (Sec. 14 (2), Art. III) No person shall be convicted of a crime except upon his confession, or unless his guilt is established by proof beyond reasonable doubt which is more than just a preponderance of evidence sufficient to win in a civil case. The burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is upon the prosecution. Its evidence must be strong enough to overturn the presumption of innocence of the accused. In case, there is a reasonable doubt of his guilt, the accused is entitled to an acquittal. (If the article tell corect) it's BOTH :) = Court records showed that Tan checked into the hotel after claiming he was robbed of his belongings at Quezon Park. He was assisted by hotel staff to contact his relatives in Singapore and the Singaporean Embassy so he could replace his stolen passport and settle his obligations with the hotel. A hotel staff communicated with Tan’s brother via e-mail, but still no money was sent to pay for his bill. The accused left the hotel on Sept.1, 2013 without paying his bill. During trial, Assistant City Prosecutor Alvin Aseniero presented as evidence Tan’s Facebook post where he even boasted his alleged other criminal activities in La Trinidad and Iloilo City and challenged authorities to “catch me if you can.” Similar STUPID as the American in USA wanted pedophile, who said similar at Facebook including posting evidence he did such crimes in Phils too. By that he was found and caught to be send to USA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now