Case of child trafficking against a Belgian thrown out

Recommended Posts

RBM
Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, robert k said:

We have been over the law here before and I don't recall anything in it that mentioned intent. It is illegal to be alone and without legally recognized familial or customary (stepfather for instance of non adopted children) relationship with children not your own, no matter the intent. I don't think present girlfriends kids qualify.

The authorities must believe there is intent on the part of the adult before an arrest will be made. Otherwise the courts would be full of innocents....I understand this is the law how ever I stand by my comments.

Yes this has been well thrashed before, correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sonjack2847
Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, RBM said:

Otherwise the courts would be full of innocents..

UM but they sometimes are.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clermont
Posted
Posted

Harrowing time for him, I hope the bail money wasn't too high because he's blown it, no such thing as a refund over there. :thumbsup:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jollygoodfellow
Posted
Posted
On 8/1/2019 at 8:48 AM, OnMyWay said:

I was referring to unmarried couples.  Once you are married, the kid is officially a step-child and I think everything is ok then.  I hope!

I wonder exactly what is any bond recognised by law

Quote

That this provision shall not apply to any person who is related within the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity or any bond recognized by law, local custom and tradition or acts in the performance of a social, moral or legal duty.

http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno7610.html#.XUPsWfIzaUk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

graham59
Posted
Posted

Stepchildren are 'ok'.

It is a legally recognised bond. (I have two from my first marriage) .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

graham59
Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, Jollygoodfellow said:

or acts in the performance of a social, moral

No doubt will include those holier than thou PRIESTS. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Forum Support
Mike J
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jollygoodfellow said:

That this provision shall not apply to any person who is related within the fourth degree of consanguinity

I must be covered because even the ladies behind the counter at the 360 Pharmacy here in town call me "Uncle".  :whistling:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jollygoodfellow
Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mike J said:

I must be covered because even the ladies behind the counter at the 360 Pharmacy here in town call me "Uncle".  :whistling:

Does "Honey" count :rolleyes:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Hounddriver
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, graham59 said:

Stepchildren are 'ok'.

So all them girls downtown who holler "Hey Daddy" at me are fair game? :whistling:

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary D
Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Dave Hounddriver said:

So all them girls downtown who holler "Hey Daddy" at me are fair game? :whistling:

That comes under a different law......incest.:mocking:

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...