Covid, devastating effect on Philippines tourism.

[Old55]

 

Philippines Faces Staggering Road to Recovery as Southeast Asia’s Most Tourism-Dependent Destination

 

Of all the major Southeast Asian destinations, the Philippines appears the worst-hit by the pandemic.

The country, despite being one of the earliest tourism players in the region and blessed with beautiful beaches and unique culture, has never managed to rub shoulders with neighbors that have grown arrivals to massive levels. Top on the list is Thailand, with 40 million arrivals in 2019, followed by Malaysia with 26 million and Singapore, 19 million. But the Philippines drew just eight million arrivals while Vietnam, a relative newcomer, passed the 18 millionth visitor mark.

While it cuts the smallest pie among the top Southeast Asia destinations, the Philippines is most dependent on tourism of them all. Tourism accounts for a quarter of its gross domestic product (GDP), compared with 20 percent for Thailand and 6 percent for Indonesia, according to tourism consultancy Pear Anderson.

 

 

Thus, while arrivals in Thailand and the Philippines last year shrunk at about the same level, down 83 and 84 percent, respectively, the Philippines suffered higher job losses of between five and six million in 2020. That’s a lot more than Thailand’s two to four million, as estimated by industry players in the two countries.

“The Philippines is suffering. Tourism is a solid foreign exchange earner and increasing numbers of the population are directly or indirectly dependent on tourism. With strict border closures and other measures taken by the government, this source of income has run dry,” said Stephan Roemer, CEO of Diethelm Travel Group, which operates Blue Horizons Travel & Tours in the Philippines.

CLOSURES

The closure of two prominent hotels, the Marco Polo Davao in June last year and the 700-room Makati Shangri-La Manila last month, although temporary, spooked many tourism players.

These institutions have seen and survived crises through decades of trading. Their decision highlights the uncomfortable specter of more closures across the industry, many permanently, in a destination where capacity and tourism infrastructure have always been key issues of growth.

With arrivals down to 1.3 million in 2020, along with the country’s infamous title as having the world’s strictest and longest lockdown, even brands such as the Shangri-La couldn’t hold the fort much longer.

“Makati Shangri-La had been offering staycation packages for residents and we had also enhanced our F&B offerings to adapt to the new business environment. Despite our best efforts however, the prolonged recovery timeline resulted in continued low business volumes. Coupled with the hotels’ dependence on the international corporate, leisure and MICE [meetings, incentives, conventions, exhibitions] markets, there was a need to [temporarily close],” said John Rice, vice president operations Philippines, Shangri-La Group.

Lockdown restrictions are gradually easing, while domestic travel is now allowed to destinations including the top three, Boracay, Palawan and Bohol. But it’s only since a few days that uniform travel protocols across local government units have been put in place, relieving travelers of the pain of navigating through different entry requirements for each place.

It is unclear when visa restrictions for foreign tourists will be lifted. Outbound travel is permitted however; a reason could be remittances by overseas Filipino workers are another key pillar of the economy.

A vaccine rollout started on March 1, but on March 2 the Philippines was widely reported as having recorded cases of the UK and South African coronavirus variants.

“It may take a while for meaningful travel volume to resume,” said Shangri-La’s Rice, who couldn’t provide an estimated reopening date for the hotel.

WORSENED

“If things don’t improve, these are kind of things that will happen,” said Aileen Clemente, chairman and president, Rajah Travel Corp, of closures or scale-backs in operation of hotels and travel companies.

Diethelm’s Roemer believes that will only worsen the lack of infrastructure in the Philippines. His Blue Horizons is fully operational, handling mainly domestic corporate travel business.

“Based on our daily experience, I would say approximately a third of hotels are closed and a bigger share of them seem unlikely to reopen in the foreseeable future. For [travel agencies], I need not mention the names that were already highlighted by the media, let alone the silent closures. Many ferry and boat operators have also ceased operations and nobody knows if they will ever come back,” said Roemer.

“The industry’s infrastructure has weakened with a part of it breaking away. Capacity will even be more limited. And exactly infrastructure has always been an issue in the Philippines.”

The private sector is finalizing “a position paper” on reopening international borders safely, which it will present to the Philippine Department of Tourism, according to Rajah’s Clemente.

“Just like any other country, there is a struggle between the ministry of health and the tourism ministry,” she said. “We can’t have a zero-risk management. Instead, take some risks but make sure we know how to respond to those risks. We’re echoing the WTTC [World Travel & Tourism Council], which has called for governments to abandon the concept of ‘high-risk countries’ and instead focus on how individual ‘high-risk travelers’ are treated at borders.”

As inbound business became limited, Rajah Travel doubled down on other revenue streams such as its Travel Academy, which was set up in 2018. Since October 2020, the academy has been offering close to 30 virtual training courses, such as tour product development or client contract management, and pivoted some of its employees to train/mentor students.

SETBACK

The pandemic is a huge setback for the Philippines’ National Tourism Development Plan 2016-2022, which envisions 12 million arrivals by 2022.

“It’s painful as we were on track with the plan,” said Clemente. “Parts of it have been implemented, for example, several tourism segments such as education tourism, nature tourism, beach tourism, et cetera, were identified and roadmaps for different products for them created.”

Milestones were made in 2019, including all-time high tourism earnings of $9.3 billion, an increase of 21 percent from 2018. This was on the back of 8.2 million arrivals, itself a double-digit 16 percent jump from 2018. The government also extended tax incentives in 2019 for another decade, to encourage investments in tourism sites in destinations such as Cebu, Palawan, Manila, Bataan, Bohol, and Surigao del Norte.

The tourism masterplan prioritized the development of adequate infrastructure, safety and security, and new tourism areas. This resulted in projects such as the opening of new Mactan-Cebu International Airport Terminal 2 and the Bohol-Panglao International Airport in 2018.

But with a freeze on international arrivals, a major income from visa fees has been lost. Moreover, last year, GDP shrunk 9.5 percent, the worst since1947 and more so when viewed against a near 6 percent growth in 2019. It is hard to imagine where the money will be coming from to crank up the tourism masterplan again.

Reliance on private sector is set to increase. One positive cheer has come from its beer conglomerate, San Miguel Corp, which in January said construction had started on its $15 billion New Manila International Airport in Bucalan, 30 kilometers north of Manila. It targets a 2025 opening which, if spot on, would ease congestion at Manila’s Ninoy Aquino International Airport. With a capacity for 100 million passengers a year, the new airport will be the second largest in the world after the new Beijing Daxing International Airport.

“The airline business will be a problem for the next six years. I will get into airlines, mark my word, but six years from now,” said Ramon Ang, president of San Miguel Corp, in this report.

 

https://skift.com/2021/03/03/philippines-faces-staggering-road-to-recovery-as-southeast-asias-most-tourism-dependent-destination/

Edited March 8, 2021 by Old55

[sonjack2847]

I first went to Thailand in 96 it was pretty much like this place is now for infrastructure. Thailand increased it`s tourism and manufacturing ability and look at the place now. Here it is so much paperwork along with the ownership of company`s which puts industry off. It needs to be a change all round to make a real difference.

[JJReyes]

Do you really want mass tourism?  The large arrival numbers have an ecological impact with minimal economic benefit for the country.  Take the example of a cruise ship arriving with 3,500 passengers.  The cost for the voyage could be in the thousands per person, but how much will end up in the local economy?  The cruise ship will be staying just one day.  Passengers are charged an extra $80 to $200 for an excursion.  Their only contact with locals is looking out the window or watching cultural show during lunch.  Shopping is limited to authorized stores (40% to 50% commission or kickback) and possibly another "free" folklorico show at dockside as the ship sails away.  In addition to a little money for the locals, the ship leaves behind trash and sewage because they are no longer permitted to dump them at sea.  

For the Chinese, Koreans, etc. arriving in the Philippines by plane, they are more likely to stay inside a resort compound for 3 to 7 days.  The complex is most likely owned by a foreign corporation along with all visitor industry services such as authorized store shopping (40% to 50% commission or kickback), bus tours, golf, etc.  Yes, labor is local and usually the minimum wage is paid.   

The visitor industry, thanks in part to Covid-19, has had the opportunity to rethink the future.  New sub-categories are emerging such as Long Stay, Staycations, Digital Nomads, etc. focused on a domestic core group and supplemented by international travelers.  

[Jollygoodfellow]

12 hours ago, sonjack2847 said:

Thailand increased it`s tourism and manufacturing ability and look at the place now.

I watch a few youtube channels and the number of closed business as in closed for good is staggering in Thailand. Will be years before anything is back to normal. 

[Jollygoodfellow]

38 minutes ago, JJReyes said:

Do you really want mass tourism?  The large arrival numbers have an ecological impact with minimal economic benefit for the country.  Take the example of a cruise ship arriving with 3,500 passengers.  The cost for the voyage could be in the thousands per person, but how much will end up in the local economy?  The cruise ship will be staying just one day.  Passengers are charged an extra $80 to $200 for an excursion.  Their only contact with locals is looking out the window or watching cultural show during lunch.  Shopping is limited to authorized stores (40% to 50% commission or kickback) and possibly another "free" folklorico show at dockside as the ship sails away.  In addition to a little money for the locals, the ship leaves behind trash and sewage because they are no longer permitted to dump them at sea.  

For the Chinese, Koreans, etc. arriving in the Philippines by plane, they are more likely to stay inside a resort compound for 3 to 7 days.  The complex is most likely owned by a foreign corporation along with all visitor industry services such as authorized store shopping (40% to 50% commission or kickback), bus tours, golf, etc.  Yes, labor is local and usually the minimum wage is paid.   

The visitor industry, thanks in part to Covid-19, has had the opportunity to rethink the future.  New sub-categories are emerging such as Long Stay, Staycations, Digital Nomads, etc. focused on a domestic core group and supplemented by international travelers.  

I dont agree with you here. The tourisam industry puts a lot of money into the economy and once employed many local people.  

[scott h]

3 hours ago, JJReyes said:

has had the opportunity to rethink the future

Good questions, but it really depends on a persons overall economic view. 

Me? I am a trickle down type guy. Like the POGO's, tourism has huge trickle down impact. 

3 hours ago, JJReyes said:

The complex is most likely owned by a foreign corporation

 But each person who works at the complex, leaves home, buys a snack, takes a trycycle to the jeepney stand, takes a jeep to the complex, works, then buys "merianda snack" at an informal stall, works, buys lunch at another informal stall, works, another "merianda, gets off work takes a jeep and trike home. Stops buy the pelenke to get food for the families dinner, buys some load from the local sari-sari.

That one "tourism" job indirectly supports 10 other jobs during the day. 

3 hours ago, JJReyes said:

focused on a domestic core group

Thats all well and good, but as the saying goes, you have to crawl before you can walk. The Philippines is in desperate straights right now

Just my humble opinion 

[Mike J]

The economy here is Moalboal has been absolutely devastated by the lack of tourists.  The only saving grace is the resilience of the Philippine people and being in the province where locals can grow food and perhaps do a little fishing.   Many of the restaurants, dive shops, resorts, etc. have closed.  Those that struggle to remain open have cut back to skeleton staff.

[RBM]

1 hour ago, Mike J said:

The economy here is Moalboal has been absolutely devastated by the lack of tourists.  The only saving grace is the resilience of the Philippine people and being in the province where locals can grow food and perhaps do a little fishing.   Many of the restaurants, dive shops, resorts, etc. have closed.  Those that struggle to remain open have cut back to skeleton staff.

Often wondered what has happened to the many dive shops, resorts there. Most owned by expats, many over heads remain even with few or no customers. 

At least now from reading the sun star its reopened so trust things are happening again.

[OnMyWay]

9 hours ago, scott h said:

Me? I am a trickle down type guy.

Saw Palmetto supplements work really good for that.

[graham59]

There has been so much time this past year to pick up some of all the millions of tons of garbage/litter thrown down everywhere in this country. Perhaps the biggest turnoff for potential tourists, who are not accustomed to living in a giant landfill site. 

Sadly I don't see much sign of any (very cheap) action in this regard. 

The place is a shit tip.